lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2017 13:26:06 +0100 (CET) From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> To: Charlemagne Lasse <charlemagnelasse@...il.com> cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...uxfoundation.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...uxfoundation.org>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@...b.com>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Russell King <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>, Rob Herring <rob.herring@...aro.org>, Jonas Oberg <jonas@...e.org>, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, Kate Stewart <kstewart@...uxfoundation.org>, Carmen Bianca Bakker <carmenbianca@...e.org> Subject: Re: [1/7] Documentation: Add license-rules.rst to describe how to properly identify file licenses On Mon, 13 Nov 2017, Charlemagne Lasse wrote: > > +If a specific tool cannot handle the standard comment style, then the > > +appropriate comment mechanism which the tool accepts shall be used. > > Most of the things sound good. But I really don't get the first-line > thing and the C++ single line comments in C sources. That's been a decision from Linus and probably not going to change, even if you argue in circles. Thanks, tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists