[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1711131324170.1851@nanos>
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2017 13:26:06 +0100 (CET)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Charlemagne Lasse <charlemagnelasse@...il.com>
cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...uxfoundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@...b.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Russell King <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>,
Rob Herring <rob.herring@...aro.org>,
Jonas Oberg <jonas@...e.org>, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org,
Kate Stewart <kstewart@...uxfoundation.org>,
Carmen Bianca Bakker <carmenbianca@...e.org>
Subject: Re: [1/7] Documentation: Add license-rules.rst to describe how to
properly identify file licenses
On Mon, 13 Nov 2017, Charlemagne Lasse wrote:
> > +If a specific tool cannot handle the standard comment style, then the
> > +appropriate comment mechanism which the tool accepts shall be used.
>
> Most of the things sound good. But I really don't get the first-line
> thing and the C++ single line comments in C sources.
That's been a decision from Linus and probably not going to change, even if
you argue in circles.
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists