[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20171113125611.449334556@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2017 13:56:24 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Xiaofei Tan <tanxiaofei@...wei.com>,
Li Bin <huawei.libin@...wei.com>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.13 03/33] workqueue: Fix NULL pointer dereference
4.13-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Li Bin <huawei.libin@...wei.com>
commit cef572ad9bd7f85035ba8272e5352040e8be0152 upstream.
When queue_work() is used in irq (not in task context), there is
a potential case that trigger NULL pointer dereference.
----------------------------------------------------------------
worker_thread()
|-spin_lock_irq()
|-process_one_work()
|-worker->current_pwq = pwq
|-spin_unlock_irq()
|-worker->current_func(work)
|-spin_lock_irq()
|-worker->current_pwq = NULL
|-spin_unlock_irq()
//interrupt here
|-irq_handler
|-__queue_work()
//assuming that the wq is draining
|-is_chained_work(wq)
|-current_wq_worker()
//Here, 'current' is the interrupted worker!
|-current->current_pwq is NULL here!
|-schedule()
----------------------------------------------------------------
Avoid it by checking for task context in current_wq_worker(), and
if not in task context, we shouldn't use the 'current' to check the
condition.
Reported-by: Xiaofei Tan <tanxiaofei@...wei.com>
Signed-off-by: Li Bin <huawei.libin@...wei.com>
Reviewed-by: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Fixes: 8d03ecfe4718 ("workqueue: reimplement is_chained_work() using current_wq_worker()")
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
kernel/workqueue_internal.h | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/kernel/workqueue_internal.h
+++ b/kernel/workqueue_internal.h
@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
#include <linux/workqueue.h>
#include <linux/kthread.h>
+#include <linux/preempt.h>
struct worker_pool;
@@ -59,7 +60,7 @@ struct worker {
*/
static inline struct worker *current_wq_worker(void)
{
- if (current->flags & PF_WQ_WORKER)
+ if (in_task() && (current->flags & PF_WQ_WORKER))
return kthread_data(current);
return NULL;
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists