[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2236FBA76BA1254E88B949DDB74E612B802BC764@IRSMSX102.ger.corp.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2017 16:01:11 +0000
From: "Reshetova, Elena" <elena.reshetova@...el.com>
To: "paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
CC: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"keescook@...omium.org" <keescook@...omium.org>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"ishkamiel@...il.com" <ishkamiel@...il.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
"stern@...land.harvard.edu" <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
"parri.andrea@...il.com" <parri.andrea@...il.com>,
"boqun.feng@...il.com" <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
"dhowells@...hat.com" <dhowells@...hat.com>,
"david@...morbit.com" <david@...morbit.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] refcount: provide same memory ordering guarantees as in
atomic_t
> On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 09:09:57AM +0000, Reshetova, Elena wrote:
> > <snip>
> >
> > > Note that there's work done on better documents and updates to this one.
> > > One document that might be good to read (I have not in fact had time to
> > > read it myself yet :-():
> > >
> > > https://github.com/aparri/memory-
> > > model/blob/master/Documentation/explanation.txt
> >
> > I have just finished reading over this and must say that this is excellent.
> > If I would have started reading on this topic from this doc and then move
> > to other in-tree docs, including memory-barriers.txt, I would
> > have had much less issues/questions and it would be much less of a bumpy
> > read.
>
> Glad you like it! May we have your Acked-by?
I think my Acked-by has little value in this case since I am really a beginner in it
myself, but I would strongly suggest to Peter and others to consider inclusion
of this doc into the tree since I do see a value in it. Again, I am not really an
important person here :)
>
> > Is there any plan to include it into official kernel doc tree? I really think it
> > would be very helpful for others also even basically to explain the notations,
> properties
> > and language people talk about these issues and give examples.
>
> Yes, we do plan to submit it for inclusion.
Great, I think it would help people!
Best Regards,
Elena.
>
>
> Thanx, Paul
>
> > I will try to improve a bit the new doc I have previously sent a patch for in the
> > spirit of this reading.
> >
> >
> > Best Regards,
> > Elena.
> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists