[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171113175436.cox5usysdi6iweod@sirena.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2017 17:54:36 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] regmap updates for v4.15
On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 09:30:28AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 9:26 AM, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
> > Actually one other thing that just occurred to me is that they might be
> > upset by the mails I send telling people I've applied their patches. If
> > that is the case I'm really not sure what to do.
> If those people then mark you as spam, then gmail would probably notice.
It's a *relatively* big form letter that gets sent out a lot (with the
patch at the bottom) so I can see automated stuff picking up on it as me
trying to sell people hot kernel contributions or whatever.
> But I don't think you apply sufficient numbers of patches for gmail to
> really care. People like David Miller, yes. But even his emails don't
> get hated on by gmail.
> So I think it's more likely that it's the spamhaus listing.
I was more thinking about spamhaus listing based on the applied mails, I
guess Google could do it directly too.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists