[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOtvUMdcFo80GCqQU9q9W7sEGK9fZUEykW59sgJMtFU59=1M_w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2017 11:33:20 +0200
From: Gilad Ben-Yossef <gilad@...yossef.com>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
Linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
driverdev-devel@...uxdriverproject.org,
Linux Crypto Mailing List <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
Ofir Drang <ofir.drang@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/24] staging: ccree: more cleanup patches
On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 8:33 PM, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com> wrote:
> These cleanups look nice. Thanks.
>
> I hope you do a mass remove of likely/unlikely in a patch soon.
> Whenever, I see one of those in a + line I always have to remind myself
> that you're planning to do it in a later patch.
>
So, a question about that - there indeed seems to be an inflation of
likely/unlikely in the ccree driver, but
what stopped me from removing them was that I found out I don't have a
clue about when it's a good idea
to use them and when it isn't (obviously in places where you know the
probable code flow of course).
Any hints?
--
Gilad Ben-Yossef
Chief Coffee Drinker
"If you take a class in large-scale robotics, can you end up in a
situation where the homework eats your dog?"
-- Jean-Baptiste Queru
Powered by blists - more mailing lists