[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1711141335220.2874@hadrien>
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2017 13:35:35 +0100 (CET)
From: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
To: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
cc: linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, cocci@...teme.lip6.fr,
Nicolas Palix <nicolas.palix@...g.fr>,
Gilles Muller <Gilles.Muller@...6.fr>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] coccinelle: fix parallel build with
CHECK=scripts/coccicheck
On Tue, 14 Nov 2017, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> The command "make -j8 C=1 CHECK=scripts/coccicheck COCCI=..." produces
> lots of "coccicheck failed" error messages.
>
> Julia Lawall explained the Coccinelle behavior as follows:
> "The problem on the Coccinelle side is that it uses a subdirectory
> with the name of the semantic patch to store standard output and
> standard error for the different threads. I didn't want to use a
> name with the pid, so that one could easily find this information
> while Coccinelle is running. Normally the subdirectory is cleaned
> up when Coccinelle completes, so there is only one of them at a time.
> Maybe it is best to just add the pid. There is the risk that these
> subdirectories will accumulate if Coccinelle crashes in a way such
> that they don't get cleaned up, but Coccinelle could print a warning
> if it detects this case, rather than failing."
>
> When scripts/coccicheck is used as CHECK tool and -j option is given
> to Make, the whole of build process runs in parallel. So, multiple
> processes try to get access to the same subdirectory.
>
> I notice spatch creates the subdirectory only when it runs in parallel
> (i.e. --jobs <N> is given and <N> is greater than 1).
>
> Setting NPROC=1 is a reasonable solution; spatch does not create the
> subdirectory. Besides, ONLINE=1 mode takes a single file input for
> each spatch invocation, so there is no reason to parallelize it in
> the first place.
>
> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
Acked-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...6.fr>
> ---
>
> Changes in v4:
> - Remove unnecessary comments. One line comment will be enough.
>
> Changes in v3:
> - Set NPROC=1 because this is a more sensible solution
> given that there is no reason to run coccinelle in parallel
> for ONLINE=1 mode.
> - Move J= option handling to a proper place.
> - Add more detailed explanation
>
> Changes in v2:
> - Grep '-j' instead of '--jobserver-auth'.
> '--jobserver-*' is not a stable option flag.
> Make 4.2 change '--jobserver-fds' into '--jobserver-auth'
> - Add -q option to grep
>
> scripts/coccicheck | 15 +++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/scripts/coccicheck b/scripts/coccicheck
> index 040a8b1..fefda40 100755
> --- a/scripts/coccicheck
> +++ b/scripts/coccicheck
> @@ -30,12 +30,6 @@ else
> VERBOSE=0
> fi
>
> -if [ -z "$J" ]; then
> - NPROC=$(getconf _NPROCESSORS_ONLN)
> -else
> - NPROC="$J"
> -fi
> -
> FLAGS="--very-quiet"
>
> # You can use SPFLAGS to append extra arguments to coccicheck or override any
> @@ -70,6 +64,9 @@ if [ "$C" = "1" -o "$C" = "2" ]; then
> # Take only the last argument, which is the C file to test
> shift $(( $# - 1 ))
> OPTIONS="$COCCIINCLUDE $1"
> +
> + # No need to parallelize Coccinelle since this mode takes one input file.
> + NPROC=1
> else
> ONLINE=0
> if [ "$KBUILD_EXTMOD" = "" ] ; then
> @@ -77,6 +74,12 @@ else
> else
> OPTIONS="--dir $KBUILD_EXTMOD $COCCIINCLUDE"
> fi
> +
> + if [ -z "$J" ]; then
> + NPROC=$(getconf _NPROCESSORS_ONLN)
> + else
> + NPROC="$J"
> + fi
> fi
>
> if [ "$KBUILD_EXTMOD" != "" ] ; then
> --
> 2.7.4
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists