[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171114143200.brmgskoqxjlrhrzx@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2017 15:32:00 +0100
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: drop hotplug lock from lru_add_drain_all
On Tue 14-11-17 15:23:47, Michal Hocko wrote:
[...]
> +/*
> + * Doesn't need any cpu hotplug locking because we do rely on per-cpu
> + * kworkers being shut down before our page_alloc_cpu_dead callback is
> + * executed on the offlined cpu
> + */
> void lru_add_drain_all(void)
> {
> static DEFINE_MUTEX(lock);
Ble the part of the comment didn't go through
diff --git a/mm/swap.c b/mm/swap.c
index 8bfdcab9f83e..1ab8122d2d0c 100644
--- a/mm/swap.c
+++ b/mm/swap.c
@@ -688,6 +688,13 @@ static void lru_add_drain_per_cpu(struct work_struct *dummy)
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct work_struct, lru_add_drain_work);
+/*
+ * Doesn't need any cpu hotplug locking because we do rely on per-cpu
+ * kworkers being shut down before our page_alloc_cpu_dead callback is
+ * executed on the offlined cpu.
+ * Calling this function with cpu hotplug locks held can actually lead
+ * to obscure indirect dependencies via WQ context.
+ */
void lru_add_drain_all(void)
{
static DEFINE_MUTEX(lock);
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists