linux-kernel - Re: n900 in next-20170901

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <e07fae95-2125-2d50-7295-ad58f9710801@ti.com>
Date:   Tue, 14 Nov 2017 22:01:33 +0200
From:   Tero Kristo <t-kristo@...com>
To:     Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
CC:     Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
        <pali.rohar@...il.com>, <sre@...nel.org>,
        kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>, <khilman@...nel.org>,
        <aaro.koskinen@....fi>, <ivo.g.dimitrov.75@...il.com>,
        <patrikbachan@...il.com>, <serge@...lyn.com>,
        <abcloriens@...il.com>,
        "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: n900 in next-20170901

On 14/11/17 21:44, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Tero Kristo <t-kristo@...com> [171114 19:34]:
>> I guess you could just use rx51_secure_dispatcher and ditch the
>> save_secure_ram_context call completely (and most of the other related
>> code)? That one would handle the cache also in a clean manner.
>>
>> Something like:
>>
>> rx51_secure_dispatcher(25, 0, FLAG_START_CRITICAL, 4,
>> __pa(omap3_secure_ram_storage), 0, 1, 1);
> 
> That's different, as rx51_secure_dispatcher does the following:
> 
> - Use arguments + 1 instead of 4, we currently use just 4
> - Disables local_irq and fiq, we are not doing that now
> - Flushes and invalidates cache range, we are not doing that
> - Calls omap_smc3 that only does mov r6, #0xff, and does not
>    do mov r2, #4
> - Missing nops after it's done
> 
> This just based on a quick look I did earlier. So just
> because of the extra work it does we don't want to do it
> even if it worked :)

Hmm ok, I was just thinking that all the extra flushes, irq disables 
etc. might be good to have in place, as a safeguard when entering secure 
mode. You might get glitches in certain conditions otherwise.

The things it is missing might just be clutter.

Anyway, that said, the changes you did look sane, but I might have 
cleaned it up a bit further. :)

-Tero

--
Texas Instruments Finland Oy, Porkkalankatu 22, 00180 Helsinki. Y-tunnus/Business ID: 0615521-4. Kotipaikka/Domicile: Helsinki