linux-kernel - Re: [intel-sgx-kernel-dev] [PATCH v5 11/11] intel

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1510693963.2850.0.camel@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Wed, 15 Nov 2017 10:12:43 +1300
From:   Kai Huang <kai.huang@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     intel-sgx-kernel-dev@...ts.01.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [intel-sgx-kernel-dev] [PATCH v5 11/11] intel_sgx: driver
 documentation

On Tue, 2017-11-14 at 21:47 +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 04:01:05PM +1300, Kai Huang wrote:
> > Not sure whether you should talk about MEE staff here. They are not
> > in
> > SDM and (thus) may potentially be changed in the future.
> 
> The use of MEE is documented in many places like
> 
>   https://eprint.iacr.org/2016/204.pdf
> 
> I see no reason not to talk about MEE.

Sure. Thanks for pointing out the paper.

> 
> > IMHO you can just remove this "virtualization" section entirely as
> > your
> > first upstreaming driver won't consider virtualization at all.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > -Kai
> 
> Makes sense.

Thanks.

Thanks,
-Kai

> 
> /Jarkko