lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALCETrWDYxZPFT=N6N3Ukci_xEU3OHS+0tajihuf+03j=0paoQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 13 Nov 2017 18:25:24 -0800
From:   Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
To:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
        Borislav Petkov <bpetkov@...e.de>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 6/7] x86/asm: Remap the TSS into the cpu entry area

On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 11:36 AM, Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 11:22 AM, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com> wrote:
>>
>> Aha, and here's the place that you need sizeof(tss_struct) to be nice
>> and page-aligned.
>
> No, it should _not_ be page-aligned. It should fit _within_ a page,
> but it 'struct tss_struct' now has something else in front of it, then
> page-aliging that is actually pointless.
>
> I forget what the actual size is, but aligning the hardware TSS struct
> to 128 bytes might be sufficient. It's not that big.

104 bytes, so it's probably already fine.  For anything except an
actual task switch, only the first 12 or so bytes matter.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ