linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: build warnings after merge of the gpio tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 15 Nov 2017 17:12:00 -0600
From:   Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        "arm@...nel.org" <arm@...nel.org>,
        Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build warnings after merge of the gpio tree

On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 4:42 PM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On Thu, 9 Nov 2017 08:37:00 -0600 Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 1:42 AM, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org> wrote:
>> > On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 4:51 AM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>> >> On Fri, 3 Nov 2017 16:37:24 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> After merging the gpio tree, yesterday's linux-next build (arm
>> >>> multi_v7_defconfig) produced these warnings:
>> >>>
>> >>> arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2835-rpi-b.dtb: Warning (phys_property): Missing property '#phy-cells' in node /phy or bad phandle (referred from /soc/usb@...80000:phys[0])
>> >>> arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2835-rpi-b-rev2.dtb: Warning (phys_property): Missing property '#phy-cells' in node /phy or bad phandle (referred from /soc/usb@...80000:phys[0])
>> >>> arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2835-rpi-a.dtb: Warning (phys_property): Missing property '#phy-cells' in node /phy or bad phandle (referred from /soc/usb@...80000:phys[0])
>> >>> arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2835-rpi-b-plus.dtb: Warning (phys_property): Missing property '#phy-cells' in node /phy or bad phandle (referred from /soc/usb@...80000:phys[0])
>> >>> arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2835-rpi-a-plus.dtb: Warning (phys_property): Missing property '#phy-cells' in node /phy or bad phandle (referred from /soc/usb@...80000:phys[0])
>> >>> arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2836-rpi-2-b.dtb: Warning (phys_property): Missing property '#phy-cells' in node /phy or bad phandle (referred from /soc/usb@...80000:phys[0])
>> >>> arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2837-rpi-3-b.dtb: Warning (phys_property): Missing property '#phy-cells' in node /phy or bad phandle (referred from /soc/usb@...80000:phys[0])
>> >>> arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2835-rpi-zero.dtb: Warning (phys_property): Missing property '#phy-cells' in node /phy or bad phandle (referred from /soc/usb@...80000:phys[0])
>> >>> arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2835-rpi-zero-w.dtb: Warning (phys_property): Missing property '#phy-cells' in node /phy or bad phandle (referred from /soc/usb@...80000:phys[0])
>> >>> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5410-odroidxu.dtb: Warning (interrupts_property): Missing interrupt-controller or interrupt-map property in /soc/system-controller@...40000
>> >>>
>> >>> and many, many more.
>> >>>
>> >>> I have no idea what caused this.
>> >>
>> >> I am still getting lots of these ...
>> >
>> > I have absolutely no clue either.
>> >
>> > What I know is that there is a device tree compiler warning that can
>> > be turned on, and
>> > it generates these warnings a lot. The actual problems have been in
>> > the DTS files
>> > forever. They just recently started to look into them.
>> >
>> > It has nothing to do with the GPIO tree whatsoever, so I wonder if it
>> > is a side effect of
>> > something else?
>
> Probably just the first tree to cause a rebuild of the dtb files after
> the change below.
>
>> There's a dtc update in -next which adds these new checks. It's been
>> there for over a month now. Unlike other dtc checks, these are
>> generally actual errors, so they are not off by default (enabled with
>> W=1,2).
>>
>> In reality, there's only about 50-100 warnings. The way dts includes
>> are structured and because the dtc checks don't have the original
>> source file lines, it just multiplies the warnings.
>
> So these (many) warnings are now in Linus' tree :-(
>
> Please do something about them.

Patches are in flight. I got all the low hanging fruit that are the
most duplicated[1]. There's other patches in flight too.

Rob

[1] https://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg616518.html