lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171115024607.6064-3-alexander.levin@verizon.com>
Date:   Wed, 15 Nov 2017 02:46:13 +0000
From:   alexander.levin@...izon.com
To:     "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, alexander.levin@...izon.com
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL for 3.18 03/16] PCI: Apply _HPX settings only to
 relevant devices

From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>

[ Upstream commit 977509f7c5c6fb992ffcdf4291051af343b91645 ]

Previously we didn't check the type of device before trying to apply Type 1
(PCI-X) or Type 2 (PCIe) Setting Records from _HPX.

We don't support PCI-X Setting Records, so this was harmless, but the
warning was useless.

We do support PCIe Setting Records, and we didn't check whether a device
was PCIe before applying settings.  I don't think anything bad happened on
non-PCIe devices because pcie_capability_clear_and_set_word(),
pcie_cap_has_lnkctl(), etc., would fail before doing any harm.  But it's
ugly to depend on those internals.

Check the device type before attempting to apply Type 1 and Type 2 Setting
Records (Type 0 records are applicable to PCI, PCI-X, and PCIe devices).

A side benefit is that this prevents useless "not supported" warnings when
a BIOS supplies a Type 1 (PCI-X) Setting Record and we try to apply it to
every single device:

  pci 0000:00:00.0: PCI-X settings not supported

After this patch, we'll get the warning only when a BIOS supplies a Type 1
record and we have a PCI-X device to which it should be applied.

Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=187731
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...izon.com>
---
 drivers/pci/probe.c | 15 +++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/probe.c b/drivers/pci/probe.c
index 7de026897f1d..c43300ced57d 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/probe.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c
@@ -1329,8 +1329,16 @@ static void program_hpp_type0(struct pci_dev *dev, struct hpp_type0 *hpp)
 
 static void program_hpp_type1(struct pci_dev *dev, struct hpp_type1 *hpp)
 {
-	if (hpp)
-		dev_warn(&dev->dev, "PCI-X settings not supported\n");
+	int pos;
+
+	if (!hpp)
+		return;
+
+	pos = pci_find_capability(dev, PCI_CAP_ID_PCIX);
+	if (!pos)
+		return;
+
+	dev_warn(&dev->dev, "PCI-X settings not supported\n");
 }
 
 static void program_hpp_type2(struct pci_dev *dev, struct hpp_type2 *hpp)
@@ -1341,6 +1349,9 @@ static void program_hpp_type2(struct pci_dev *dev, struct hpp_type2 *hpp)
 	if (!hpp)
 		return;
 
+	if (!pci_is_pcie(dev))
+		return;
+
 	if (hpp->revision > 1) {
 		dev_warn(&dev->dev, "PCIe settings rev %d not supported\n",
 			 hpp->revision);
-- 
2.11.0

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ