linux-kernel - Re: [GIT pull] printk updates for 4.15

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20171115004838.GA822@jagdpanzerIV>
Date:   Wed, 15 Nov 2017 09:48:38 +0900
From:   Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
To:     Mark Salyzyn <salyzyn@...roid.com>
Cc:     Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT pull] printk updates for 4.15

Hello Mark,

On (11/14/17 07:56), Mark Salyzyn wrote:
[..]
> Thanks for the vote of confidence :-) but we were holding back re spinning
> that set until the ability to switch the primary timestamp got accepted. (we
> were to use U suffix for realtime, B for boottime etc to designate them).
> 
> Printing the other timebases during major disruptions (suspend/resume/etc)
> was needed for our battery monitoring analysis tools, and we only used them
> as synchronization markers as a secondary effect.
> 
> But we _also_ had Android partners asking if it was possible to switch the
> primary (dmesg) timestamp to one of boottime or realtime to aid in triaging
> temporal issues. Doing so in the tool was sometimes too inaccurate
> (~+/-20ms) even with help sniffing the periodic synchronization/disruption
> prints. Switching the timebase for dmesg gave us roughly 1000 times more
> comparative time precision which helps immensely when trying to correlate
> and order the sequence of events in user space and kernel activities.

have you considered trace points?

	-ss