lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d1aa3e79-7538-6671-dbff-04a3b000bfe5@redhat.com>
Date:   Wed, 15 Nov 2017 09:34:20 +0100
From:   Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To:     David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
        Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Cc:     kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        tglx@...utronix.de, rkrcmar@...hat.com, borntraeger@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86,kvm: move qemu/guest FPU switching out to vcpu_run

On 14/11/2017 20:40, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> I think we should check all get/put_fpu callers if they need
> preempt_disable().
> 
> E.g. em_fxrstor() needs disabled preemption as we temporarily
> save + restore some host register (via fxsave + fxrstor) under some
> circumstances that are not saved/restored when switching to/back from
> another process. We should double check.

Rik may correct me, but I believe that you don't need
preempt_disable/enable because preempt notifiers do this for you.

Paolo

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ