linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] rtc: Add tracepoints for RTC system

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20171115092539.xrenngsxvsxzizs3@piout.net>
Date:   Wed, 15 Nov 2017 10:25:39 +0100
From:   Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>
To:     Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...aro.org>
Cc:     a.zummo@...ertech.it, rostedt@...dmis.org, mingo@...hat.com,
        linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        arnd@...db.de, broonie@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rtc: Add tracepoints for RTC system

Hi,

On 15/11/2017 at 15:30:21 +0800, Baolin Wang wrote:
> It will be more helpful to add some tracepoints to track RTC actions when
> debugging RTC driver. Below sample is that we set/read the RTC time, then
> set 2 alarms, so we can see the trace logs:

I'm not sure it is actually useful when debugging an RTC driver because
you will be interested in the real values that are written to or read
from the RTC, not what is returned by the driver to the RTC core as this
information is already readily available to userspace.

Is this really worth the added overhead?

Maybe you have another use case?


-- 
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com