linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 00/11] Intel SGX Driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1711151127570.1805@nanos>
Date:   Wed, 15 Nov 2017 11:35:42 +0100 (CET)
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:     Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
cc:     intel-sgx-kernel-dev@...ts.01.org,
        platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, x86@...nel.org,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/11] Intel SGX Driver

On Mon, 13 Nov 2017, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:

Any reason why you did not CC the x86 maintainers and other x86 developers
who have had opinions on the first attempt to get SGX into the kernel?

This is not some driver for a random peripheral. This has substantional
effects. I'm assuming you simply forgot or were not aware, but this is not
the way this works.

Thanks,

	tglx