linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] hwspinlock: Change hwspinlock to a bool

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMz4ku+G91yZisM5zZEthXxLu2ruVivxNZgeP3N3LQ8tGTFs7A@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 15 Nov 2017 10:07:34 +0800
From:   Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...aro.org>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:     Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@...ery.com>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hwspinlock: Change hwspinlock to a bool

On 14 November 2017 at 23:03, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 08:58:18PM +0800, Baolin Wang wrote:
>> On 4 November 2017 at 14:37, Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...aro.org> wrote:
>> > Change hwspinlock to a bool in case some drivers will meet dependency
>> > issue when hwspinlock is built as a module.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...aro.org>
>
>> Could you apply this patch into K4.15 if there are no other comments? Thanks.
>
> It's in -next already as commit d048236dfdfe454f059a0837431c3ae3d166d4d6
> so it ought to get sent during the merge window.

Ah, OK. Thanks Mark.

-- 
Baolin.wang
Best Regards