linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86/mce: add support SRAO reported via CMC check

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <a4f71bd9-64bc-48c4-5662-dd9387cb68bc@huawei.com>
Date:   Wed, 15 Nov 2017 10:39:18 +0800
From:   Xie XiuQi <xiexiuqi@...wei.com>
To:     "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
CC:     "bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>,
        "tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        "mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
        "hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>, "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
        "linux-edac@...r.kernel.org" <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/mce: add support SRAO reported via CMC check

Hi Tony,

On 2017/11/15 10:13, Luck, Tony wrote:
>> OK, I'll add check for OVER=0 in v2.
> 
> Thinking a bit more on this ... do you just need to remove the check
> for S=1 from the existing "AO" entries?  Or do we need the CMCI
> match entry early in the table?

Yes, we could just remove the check for S=1, and place "AO" entries before
"UCNA" entries.

Is that right?

> 
> -Tony
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-edac" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 
> 

-- 
Thanks,
Xie XiuQi