[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171115151052.27y2uzwwxlu4vtr2@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2017 16:10:52 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc: luca abeni <luca.abeni@...tannapisa.it>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: New sparse warnings from sched.h
* Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 09:27:43AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org> wrote:
> > > commit 799ba82de01e7543f6b2042e1a739f3a20255f23
> > > Author: luca abeni <luca.abeni@...tannapisa.it>
> > > Date: Thu Sep 7 12:09:31 2017 +0200
> > >
> > > sched/deadline: Use C bitfields for the state flags
> > >
> > > Ask the compiler to use a single bit for storing true / false values,
> > > instead of wasting the size of a whole int value.
> > > Tested with gcc 5.4.0 on x86_64, and the compiler produces the expected
> > > Assembly (similar to the Assembly code generated when explicitly accessing
> > > the bits with bitmasks, "&" and "|").
> > >
> > > produces four warnings from sparse for every file which includes sched.h:
> > >
> > > ./include/linux/sched.h:476:62: error: dubious one-bit signed bitfield
> > > ./include/linux/sched.h:477:62: error: dubious one-bit signed bitfield
> > > ./include/linux/sched.h:478:62: error: dubious one-bit signed bitfield
> > > ./include/linux/sched.h:479:62: error: dubious one-bit signed bitfield
> > >
> > > This seems like the trivial fix (untested):
> > >
> > >
> > > diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
> > > index a5dc7c98b0a2..21991d668d35 100644
> > > --- a/include/linux/sched.h
> > > +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
> > > @@ -473,10 +473,10 @@ struct sched_dl_entity {
> > > * conditions between the inactive timer handler and the wakeup
> > > * code.
> > > */
> > > - int dl_throttled : 1;
> > > - int dl_boosted : 1;
> > > - int dl_yielded : 1;
> > > - int dl_non_contending : 1;
> > > + unsigned int dl_throttled : 1;
> > > + unsigned int dl_boosted : 1;
> > > + unsigned int dl_yielded : 1;
> > > + unsigned int dl_non_contending : 1;
> > >
> > > /*
> > > * Bandwidth enforcement timer. Each -deadline task has its
> >
> > Mind sending a proper patch with a SOB once it's tested?
>
> I'd be more than happy to do that. I have no idea what this code is,
> what it's used for, or how to test it, so I'll have to rely on somebody
> else to test it.
Oh, I thought you wanted to test whether it fixes the Sparse bug.
Converting these bitfields from signed to unsigned should have no effect on the
deadline scheduler.
I.e. I basically only need your Signed-off-by.
Thnaks,
Ingo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists