[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171115152746.w4giwt7kdqm4i3yl@rob-hp-laptop>
Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2017 09:27:46 -0600
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Eugen Hristev <eugen.hristev@...rochip.com>
Cc: nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com, alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, lars@...afoo.de,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ludovic.desroches@...rochip.com,
jic23@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] dt-bindings: iio: at91-sama5d2_adc: add optional
dma property
On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 02:56:45PM +0200, Eugen Hristev wrote:
> Added property for DMA configuration of the device.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eugen Hristev <eugen.hristev@...rochip.com>
> ---
> Changes in v3:
> None, but we discussed on the ML about whether we should have "dma-names"
> present in the binding even if it's only one.
> The helpers in the kernel to retrieve the channel info rely on the
> presence of this property, so I am resending the patch based on this.
> If another solution is better, please advise and I can try it and
> resend the patch.
Really the kernel APIs should accept a NULL name and return the DMA
channel when there is only one. This is how the clk_get API works for
example.
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/at91-sama5d2_adc.txt | 7 +++++++
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
In any case, not really a big deal.
Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists