linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4.4 00/56] 4.4.98-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20171115162238.GA29282@roeck-us.net>
Date:   Wed, 15 Nov 2017 08:22:38 -0800
From:   Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>,
        Milosz Wasilewski <milosz.wasilewski@...aro.org>,
        Tom Gall <tom.gall@...aro.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>, patches@...nelci.org,
        Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk>,
        linux- stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.4 00/56] 4.4.98-stable review

On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 04:17:19PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 05:45:41PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
...
> > 
> > Please ignore this LTP readahead02 failure.
> > Re-tested and it got pass.
> > 
> > - cd /opt/ltp/testcases/bin/
> > - export TMPDIR=/home
> > - ./readahead02
> > 
> > readahead02    0  TINFO  :  creating test file of size: 67108864
> > readahead02    0  TINFO  :  read_testfile(0)
> > readahead02    0  TINFO  :  read_testfile(1)
> > readahead02    0  TINFO  :  readahead calls made: 16384
> > readahead02    1  TPASS  :  offset is still at 0 as expected
> > readahead02    0  TINFO  :  read_testfile(0) took: 973355 usec
> > readahead02    0  TINFO  :  read_testfile(1) took: 281199 usec
> > readahead02    0  TINFO  :  read_testfile(0) read: 67108864 bytes
> > readahead02    0  TINFO  :  read_testfile(1) read: 0 bytes
> > readahead02    2  TPASS  :  readahead saved some I/O
> > readahead02    0  TINFO  :  cache can hold at least: 364856 kB
> > readahead02    0  TINFO  :  read_testfile(0) used cache: 65252 kB
> > readahead02    0  TINFO  :  read_testfile(1) used cache: 65368 kB
> > readahead02    3  TPASS  :  using cache as expected
> 
> You all need to really fix up your testing systems... :(
> 
Hard lesson to learn. Tests are not as deterministic as we would like them
to be. For my part, I tend to re-run qemu tests before I report failures
because some failures are sporadic. After a couple of years I know the
usual suspects, which helps. Adding an automatic retry mechanism might
be useful.

Guenter