linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] cgroup/cpuset: remove circular dependency deadlock

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 15 Nov 2017 22:48:21 +0530
From:   Prateek Sood <prsood@...eaurora.org>
To:     Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     longman@...hat.com, lizefan@...wei.com, mingo@...nel.org,
        boqun.feng@...il.com, tglx@...utronix.de, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
        sramana@...eaurora.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] cgroup/cpuset: remove circular dependency deadlock

On 11/15/2017 10:35 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 11:37:42AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 03:56:26PM +0530, Prateek Sood wrote:
>>> Any improvement/suggestion for this patch?
>>
>> I would have done 2 patches, the first one solving the locking issue,
>> the second removing the then redundant async rebuild stuff.
>>
>> Other than that this looks OK I suppose, but I was expecting this to go
>> through the cgroup tree, TJ?
> 
> Will pick them up after -rc1.
> 
> Thanks.
> 

I have made two patches as suggested by Peter and sent for review. 

-- 
Qualcomm India Private Limited, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation
Center, Inc., is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation
Collaborative Project