linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH][v3] uprobes/x86: emulate push insns for uprobe on x86

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 15 Nov 2017 09:25:05 -0800
From:   Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>
To:     Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
CC:     <mingo@...nel.org>, <tglx@...utronix.de>, <peterz@...radead.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <x86@...nel.org>,
        <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <ast@...com>, <kernel-team@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][v3] uprobes/x86: emulate push insns for uprobe on x86



On 11/15/17 9:07 AM, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 11/15, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>>
>> So please, check if uprobe_init_insn() fails or not in this case. After that
>> we will know whether your patch needs the additional is_64bit_mm() check in
>> push_setup_xol_ops() or not.
> 
> OK, I did the check for you.
> 
> uprobe_init_insn() doesn't fail but insn_init(x86_64 => 0) parse it as
> single-byte insn with OPCODE1 == 0x41, so push_setup_xol_ops() doesn't
> need to worry about compat tasks.
> 
> In short, your "V2" should be fine except you can factor out
> auprobe->push.ilen initialization (as you did in V3). Please send V4.

Thanks a lot! I am just about to use inline asm or binary rewriter to 
create such a code for testing...

I will send V4 shortly.

> 
> Oleg.
>