linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3.16 000/294] 3.16.50-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAOi56cX3YFWiZLRx4vmELdFixsR+=HXkVSPRVJQZ3Y69kAzS8A@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 15 Nov 2017 20:02:04 -0800
From:   Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Cc:     Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "# 3.4.x" <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        "kernelci.org bot" <bot@...nelci.org>,
        Matt Hart <matthew.hart@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.16 000/294] 3.16.50-rc1 review

On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 12:55 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 9:35 PM, Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 5:35 AM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 1:48 PM, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com> wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Nov 09, 2017 at 12:40:36PM +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, 2017-11-09 at 13:21 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>>>> > On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 1:08 PM, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com> wrote:
>>>>> > > On Thu, Nov 09, 2017 at 12:55:30PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>>>> [...]
>>>>> > > > I think if you upload the branch to the stable-rc git, that should produce
>>>>> > > > the automated build and boot results via email or via the
>>>>> > > > https://kernelci.org/job/ interface. Once there are some results
>>>>> > > > there, I'll go through the list once more to see what warnings
>>>>> > > > and failures remain.
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > > I don't know of a way to have others push to that tree/branch at the
>>>>> > > moment :(
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > > I'll go update that branch now...
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Thanks!
>>>>> >
>>>>> > With the arm-soc tree, we simply have a shared group-id on
>>>>> > gitolite.kernel.org and everyone in that group can push to it.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > If that is the only thing you need, it should be trivial to let Ben
>>>>> > and Sasha push to /pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/*.git as well,
>>>>> > I'm sure helpdesk@...nel.org can arrange that. Of course if you are
>>>>> > worried about having multiple accounts with write access to all the
>>>>> > branches, then that wouldn't be enough.
>>>>>
>>>>> I think I'd rather send a pull request to Greg at the start of the
>>>>> review period.
>>>>
>>>> That works for me!
>>>
>>> We just discussed this on the #kernelci IRC channel. Since kernelci
>>> has a whitelist of branches and 3.16 isn't currently on it, how about
>>> just adding a different git tree for Ben's 3.2-rc and 3.16-rc releases?
>>
>> We are currently reaching the limits of our current build capacity, so
>> want to understand the users before adding more trees.
>>
>> That being said, it seems Ben is now pushing to Greg's stable-rc, so
>> we can pretty easily add linux-3.16.y to our list of stable-rc
>> branches if there is enough interest.  Also, we would much prefer
>> monitoring a git branch, since kernelci does not currently deal with
>> git + quilt (and we have no time, and less motivation to add it) :)
>
> Ben does not push to Greg's stable-rc, that was a mistake on my
> side,

Any reason not to push to Greg's stable-rc (or have Greg pull)?

It would be a lot simpler from our side if we didn't have to track the
various stable tree maintainers.

Kevin