lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANRm+Cyb9J8vE4jamLRHmYCsTpr1u9N4pmFG3nj83YoCgCZaZQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 16 Nov 2017 13:54:12 +0800
From:   Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@...il.com>
To:     Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Cc:     Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, kvm <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
        Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Radim Krcmar <rkrcmar@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86,kvm: move qemu/guest FPU switching out to vcpu_run

2017-11-15 22:40 GMT+08:00 Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>:
> On Wed, 2017-11-15 at 12:33 +0800, Wanpeng Li wrote:
>> 2017-11-15 11:03 GMT+08:00 Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>:
>> > On Wed, 2017-11-15 at 08:47 +0800, Wanpeng Li wrote:
>> > > 2017-11-15 5:54 GMT+08:00  <riel@...hat.com>:
>> > > > From: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
>> > > >
>> > > > Currently, every time a VCPU is scheduled out, the host kernel
>> > > > will
>> > > > first save the guest FPU/xstate context, then load the qemu
>> > > > userspace
>> > > > FPU context, only to then immediately save the qemu userspace
>> > > > FPU
>> > > > context back to memory. When scheduling in a VCPU, the same
>> > > > extraneous
>> > > > FPU loads and saves are done.
>> > > >
>> > > > This could be avoided by moving from a model where the guest
>> > > > FPU is
>> > > > loaded and stored with preemption disabled, to a model where
>> > > > the
>> > > > qemu userspace FPU is swapped out for the guest FPU context for
>> > > > the duration of the KVM_RUN ioctl.
>> > >
>> > > What will happen if CONFIG_PREEMPT is enabled?
>> >
>> > The scheduler will save the guest FPU context when a
>> > VCPU thread is preempted, and restore it when it is
>> > scheduled back in.
>>
>> I mean all the involved processes will use fpu. Before patch if
>> kernel
>> preempt occur:
>>
>> context_switch
>>   -> prepare_task_switch
>>         -> fire_sched_out_preempt_notifiers
>>               -> kvm_sched_out
>>                     -> kvm_arch_vcpu_put
>>                           -> kvm_put_guest_fpu
>>                                -> copy_fpregs_to_fpstate(&vcpu-
>> >arch.guest_fpu)
>>                                     save xsave area to guest fpu
>> buffer
>>                                -> __kernel_fpu_end
>>                                      ->
>> copy_kernel_to_fpregs(&current->thread.fpu.state)
>>                                          restore prev vCPU qemu
>> userspace FPU to the xsave area
>>   -> switch_to
>>         -> __switch_to
>>             -> switch_fpu_prepare
>>                   -> copy_fpregs_to_fpstate => save xsave area to
>> prev
>> vCPU qemu userspace FPU
>>             -> switch_fpu_finish
>>                   -> copy_kernel_to_fpgregs => restore next task FPU
>> to xsave area
>>
>>
>> After the patch:
>>
>> context_switch
>>   -> prepare_task_switch
>>         -> fire_sched_out_preempt_notifiers
>>               -> kvm_sched_out
>>
>>  -> switch_to
>>         -> __switch_to
>>             -> switch_fpu_prepare
>>                   -> copy_fpregs_to_fpstate         => Oops
>>                   save xsave area to prev vCPU qemu userspace FPU,
>> actually the guest FPU buffer is loaded in xsave area, you transmit
>> guest FPU in xsave area into the prev vCPU qemu userspace FPU
>
> When entering kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run we save the qemu userspace
> FPU context in &vcpu->arch.user_fpu, and we restore that before
> leaving kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run.
>
> Userspace should always see the userspace FPU context, no?

You are right.

Regards,
Wanpeng Li

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ