linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] coccinelle: flags.cocci: reorganize patterns to improve efficiency

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1711160830190.12570@hadrien>
Date:   Thu, 16 Nov 2017 08:31:24 +0100 (CET)
From:   Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
To:     Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
cc:     Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>,
        Nicolas Palix <nicolas.palix@...g.fr>, cocci@...teme.lip6.fr
Subject: Re: [PATCH] coccinelle: flags.cocci: reorganize patterns to improve
 efficiency



On Wed, 15 Nov 2017, Joe Perches wrote:

> On Wed, 2017-11-15 at 22:55 +0100, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > What version of Coccinelle do you have?
> > > I tried 1.0.4 and 1.0.6,
> > > but both failed.
> > For me, it also fails for 1.0.6.  It should be OK for 1.0.7.
>
> Then likely this patch should not be applied or
> some form of local version checking should be done
> in the script itself.
>
> Scripts that use various tools are subject to
> language versioning requirements.
>
> For instance, there are many things that are
> possible with later versions of perl, but are not
> done for various scripts because many distributions
> do not ship with the latest versions.

It will say coccicheck failed if it is not compatible with the version of
Coccinelle.  But it shouldn't break anything.  We should put that it
requires 1.0.7, but I don't know if that is actually checked, or just
provided as documentation for the reader.

julia