lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 15 Nov 2017 23:58:44 -0800
From:   Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To:     Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
Cc:     Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
        Harald Freudenberger <freude@...ibm.com>,
        linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] s390/ap_bus: Convert timers to use timer_setup()

On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 11:29 PM, Martin Schwidefsky
<schwidefsky@...ibm.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Nov 2017 16:36:53 -0700
> Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 11:38 PM, Martin Schwidefsky
>> <schwidefsky@...ibm.com> wrote:
>> > On Wed, 25 Oct 2017 03:27:37 -0700
>> > Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote:
>> >
>> >> In preparation for unconditionally passing the struct timer_list pointer to
>> >> all timer callbacks, switch to using the new timer_setup() and from_timer()
>> >> to pass the timer pointer explicitly.
>> >>
>> >> Cc: Harald Freudenberger <freude@...ibm.com>
>> >> Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
>> >> Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
>> >> Cc: linux-s390@...r.kernel.org
>> >> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
>> >> ---
>> >>  drivers/s390/crypto/ap_bus.c   | 10 +++++-----
>> >>  drivers/s390/crypto/ap_bus.h   |  2 +-
>> >>  drivers/s390/crypto/ap_queue.c |  2 +-
>> >>  3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>> >
>> > Parked for the second part of the s390 updates for the next merge window.
>> > Thanks.
>>
>> Thanks for getting these staged. I just wanted to check with you,
>> since I don't see these in -next anywhere yet:
>>
>> s390: qdio: Convert timers to use timer_setup()
>> s390/sclp: Convert timers to use timer_setup()
>> s390/cio: Convert timers to use timer_setup()
>> s390/scsi: Convert timers to use timer_setup()
>> s390/ap_bus: Convert timers to use timer_setup()
>>
>> Are all of these expected to land for -rc1? (Would it help to carry
>> them in the timer tree?) I've got tree-wide changes ready to go once
>> all these conversions have landed.
>
> These patches are parked on a private branches. The features branch
> on s390/linux is the one that is used for -next AND for the upstream
> merge. And since I do not want to rebase that branch the timer_setup
> patches are not in -next as well.
>
> Four of you patches are safe with me, the s390/scsi patch is in
> Steffens patch queue. All good I would say.

Hi,

I saw s390 get merged for -rc1, but none of these timer_setup()
conversions were included. Given the possible short merge window,
what's the state of these? I can't do the bulk API changes at the end
of -rc1 without the s390 timer patches. Anything I can help with?

Thanks!

-Kees

-- 
Kees Cook
Pixel Security

Powered by blists - more mailing lists