linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] PM / runtime: Drop children check from __pm_runtime_set

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 16 Nov 2017 10:22:41 +0100
From:   Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
To:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc:     Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PM / runtime: Drop children check from
 __pm_runtime_set_status()

On Sun, Nov 12, 2017 at 01:27:30AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> 
> The check for "active" children in __pm_runtime_set_status(), when
> trying to set the parent device status to "suspended", doesn't
> really make sense, because in fact it is not invalid to set the
> status of a device with runtime PM disabled to "suspended" in any
> case.  It is invalid to enable runtime PM for a device with its
> status set to "suspended" while its child_count reference counter
> is nonzero, but the check in __pm_runtime_set_status() doesn't
> really cover that situation.
> 
> For this reason, drop the children check from __pm_runtime_set_status()
> and add a check against child_count reference counters of "suspended"
> devices to pm_runtime_enable().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>

Looks good to me, but you should also fix
Documentation/power/runtime_pm.txt which was updated to reflect the
constraint that is now being reverted.

Reviewed-by: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>

Thanks,
Johan