[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171116004457.GA12222@bbox>
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2017 09:44:57 +0900
From: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
Cc: Wang Nan <wangnan0@...wei.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, will.deacon@....com,
Bob Liu <liubo95@...wei.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>,
Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@...dex-team.ru>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arch, mm: introduce arch_tlb_gather_mmu_lazy (was: Re:
[RESEND PATCH] mm, oom_reaper: gather each vma to prevent) leaking TLB entry
On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 09:14:52AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Mon 13-11-17 09:28:33, Minchan Kim wrote:
> [...]
> > void arch_tlb_gather_mmu(...)
> >
> > tlb->fullmm = !(start | (end + 1)) && atomic_read(&mm->mm_users) == 0;
>
> Sorry, I should have realized sooner but this will not work for the oom
> reaper. It _can_ race with the final exit_mmap and run with mm_users == 0
If someone see mm_users is zero, it means there is no user to access
address space by stale TLB. Am I missing something?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists