linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V13 00/10] mmc: Add Command Queue support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-id: <1716036.6EalJ2kXtr@amdc3058>
Date:   Thu, 16 Nov 2017 10:46:40 +0100
From:   Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>
To:     Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
Cc:     Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
        linux-mmc <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-block <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Bough Chen <haibo.chen@....com>,
        Alex Lemberg <alex.lemberg@...disk.com>,
        Mateusz Nowak <mateusz.nowak@...el.com>,
        Yuliy Izrailov <Yuliy.Izrailov@...disk.com>,
        Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@...sung.com>,
        Dong Aisheng <dongas86@...il.com>,
        Das Asutosh <asutoshd@...eaurora.org>,
        Zhangfei Gao <zhangfei.gao@...il.com>,
        Sahitya Tummala <stummala@...eaurora.org>,
        Harjani Ritesh <riteshh@...eaurora.org>,
        Venu Byravarasu <vbyravarasu@...dia.com>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@...k-chips.com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V13 00/10] mmc: Add Command Queue support

On Friday, November 03, 2017 03:20:10 PM Adrian Hunter wrote:
> Hi
> 
> Here is V13 of the hardware command queue patches without the software
> command queue patches, now using blk-mq and now with blk-mq support for
> non-CQE I/O.
> 
> HW CMDQ offers 25% - 50% better random multi-threaded I/O.  I see a slight
> 2% drop in sequential read speed but no change to sequential write.
> 
> Non-CQE blk-mq showed a 3% decrease in sequential read performance.  This
> seemed to be coming from the inferior latency of running work items compared
> with a dedicated thread.  Hacking blk-mq workqueue to be unbound reduced the
> performance degradation from 3% to 1%.
> 
> While we should look at changing blk-mq to give better workqueue performance,
> a bigger gain is likely to be made by adding a new host API to enable the
> next already-prepared request to be issued directly from within ->done()
> callback of the current request.

Tested-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com> [ for non-CQE changes ]

Best regards,
--
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
Samsung Electronics