[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171116115433.GG9361@arm.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2017 11:54:33 +0000
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
To: Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>
Cc: Alex Matveev <alxmtvv@...il.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
Greg Hackmann <ghackmann@...gle.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
Maxim Kuvyrkov <maxim.kuvyrkov@...aro.org>,
Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Yury Norov <ynorov@...iumnetworks.com>,
Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 11/18] arm64: make mrs_s and msr_s macros work with LTO
On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 01:34:21PM -0800, Sami Tolvanen wrote:
> From: Alex Matveev <alxmtvv@...il.com>
>
> Use UNDEFINE_MRS_S and UNDEFINE_MSR_S to define corresponding macros
> in-place and workaround gcc and clang limitations on redefining macros
> across different assembler blocks.
What limitations? Can you elaborate please? Is this a fix?
Will
Powered by blists - more mailing lists