[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a3nSyn5KaaSM00-99bk3LAdpSzsorX5wffp+jsBHN9tgg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2017 13:51:15 +0100
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: Tatyana Nikolova <Tatyana.E.Nikolova@...el.com>,
Roland Dreier <roland@...estorage.com>,
Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
linux-rdma <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] RDMA/iwpm: Fix uninitialized error code in iwpm_send_mapinfo()
On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 1:03 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven
<geert@...ux-m68k.org> wrote:
> Hi Arnd,
>
> On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 12:32 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 12:05 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven
>> <geert@...ux-m68k.org> wrote:
>> I see my problem now, my randconfig test series has a patch I never sent
>> out, see https://pastebin.com/ZJDHP7g4 ;-)
>
> I was already wondering why I suddenly started seeing many non-false
> positives reaching Linus' tree ;-)
> Lately you've been catching all of them in -next, before they had a chance
> to appear in upstream.
The patch is only for older compilers that I don't regularly test with, it
should not have made a big difference here.
I was going to submit the patch but took a look at some of the remaining
warnings and came across the bug leading to https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/9/15/384,
so I ended up not sending it, but still had it in my queue.
Not sure what happened to that patch though, I think it was in linux-next
at some point (which means I dropped it during rebasing), but it's not
there now.
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists