[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171116144813.qb446fhkdzok2fo7@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2017 14:48:13 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
ALSA <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>, Takashi <tiwai@...e.de>,
Pierre <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>,
Sanyog Kale <sanyog.r.kale@...el.com>,
Shreyas NC <shreyas.nc@...el.com>, patches.audio@...el.com,
alan@...ux.intel.com,
Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.cirrus.com>,
Sagar Dharia <sdharia@...eaurora.org>,
srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org, plai@...eaurora.org,
Sudheer Papothi <spapothi@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 07/14] regmap: Add SoundWire bus support
On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 06:32:35PM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 12:04:37PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 05:19:09PM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
> > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(__regmap_init_sdw);
> > We still have plain EXPORT_SYMBOL() on the regmap exports...
> I assumed after Alan's clarification that it is okay to do so. Let me know if
> you feel otherwise
No, I'm not which is why I replied to Alan's most recent mail explaining
that I felt he was missing my point. For the bus code itself I don't
really care either way, this is just about this one file.
To repeat this is a pretty thin layer of code tying regmap and Soundwire
together, it's not as substantial as the bus code itself. The exports
have no meaning outside of a kernel context and within that context it's
hard to see a natural use case for doing this. It's much easier to see
cases where someone causes themselves problems by reading too much into
the use of plain EXPORT_SYMBOL(), perhaps not considering things as
carefully as they might otherwise have done.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists