linux-kernel - [PATCH 1/2] ALSA: nm256: Adjust five function calls together with a variable assignment

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 16 Nov 2017 18:07:27 +0100
From:   SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
To:     alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
        Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@...il.com>,
        Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
        Takashi Sakamoto <o-takashi@...amocchi.jp>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] ALSA: nm256: Adjust five function calls together with a
 variable assignment

From: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2017 17:37:26 +0100

The script "checkpatch.pl" pointed information out like the following.

ERROR: do not use assignment in if condition

Thus fix affected source code places.

Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
---
 sound/pci/nm256/nm256.c | 19 +++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/sound/pci/nm256/nm256.c b/sound/pci/nm256/nm256.c
index b97f4ea6b56c..35ce5b3fd81a 100644
--- a/sound/pci/nm256/nm256.c
+++ b/sound/pci/nm256/nm256.c
@@ -1334,7 +1334,8 @@ snd_nm256_mixer(struct nm256 *chip)
 	if (! chip->ac97_regs)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
-	if ((err = snd_ac97_bus(chip->card, 0, &ops, NULL, &pbus)) < 0)
+	err = snd_ac97_bus(chip->card, 0, &ops, NULL, &pbus);
+	if (err < 0)
 		return err;
 
 	memset(&ac97, 0, sizeof(ac97));
@@ -1493,7 +1494,8 @@ snd_nm256_create(struct snd_card *card, struct pci_dev *pci,
 
 	*chip_ret = NULL;
 
-	if ((err = pci_enable_device(pci)) < 0)
+	err = pci_enable_device(pci);
+	if (err < 0)
 		return err;
 
 	chip = kzalloc(sizeof(*chip), GFP_KERNEL);
@@ -1585,7 +1587,8 @@ snd_nm256_create(struct snd_card *card, struct pci_dev *pci,
 		chip->buffer_end = buffer_top;
 	else {
 		/* get buffer end pointer from signature */
-		if ((err = snd_nm256_peek_for_sig(chip)) < 0)
+		err = snd_nm256_peek_for_sig(chip);
+		if (err < 0)
 			goto __error;
 	}
 
@@ -1635,7 +1638,8 @@ snd_nm256_create(struct snd_card *card, struct pci_dev *pci,
 
 	// pci_set_master(pci); /* needed? */
 	
-	if ((err = snd_device_new(card, SNDRV_DEV_LOWLEVEL, chip, &ops)) < 0)
+	err = snd_device_new(card, SNDRV_DEV_LOWLEVEL, chip, &ops);
+	if (err < 0)
 		goto __error;
 
 	*chip_ret = chip;
@@ -1717,7 +1721,9 @@ static int snd_nm256_probe(struct pci_dev *pci,
 		capture_bufsize = 4;
 	if (capture_bufsize > 128)
 		capture_bufsize = 128;
-	if ((err = snd_nm256_create(card, pci, &chip)) < 0) {
+
+	err = snd_nm256_create(card, pci, &chip);
+	if (err < 0) {
 		snd_card_free(card);
 		return err;
 	}
@@ -1744,7 +1750,8 @@ static int snd_nm256_probe(struct pci_dev *pci,
 		card->shortname,
 		chip->buffer_addr, chip->cport_addr, chip->irq);
 
-	if ((err = snd_card_register(card)) < 0) {
+	err = snd_card_register(card);
+	if (err < 0) {
 		snd_card_free(card);
 		return err;
 	}
-- 
2.15.0