[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171116172437.k64r5c6ehujwvogd@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2017 17:24:37 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>
Cc: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
ALSA <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>, Takashi <tiwai@...e.de>,
Pierre <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>,
Sanyog Kale <sanyog.r.kale@...el.com>,
Shreyas NC <shreyas.nc@...el.com>, patches.audio@...el.com,
alan@...ux.intel.com,
Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.cirrus.com>,
Sagar Dharia <sdharia@...eaurora.org>, plai@...eaurora.org,
Sudheer Papothi <spapothi@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/14] soundwire: Add SoundWire bus type
On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 10:32:21PM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 04:05:17PM +0000, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
> > >+static const struct sdw_device_id *
> > >+sdw_get_device_id(struct sdw_slave *slave, struct sdw_driver *drv)
> > Indentation looks Odd here,
> not really, the return type in preceding line is a perfect way to define
> things...
Yeah, that's fairly normal - just ugly long. You could also do it by
splitting the arguments over two lines.
> > >+ ret = dev_pm_domain_attach(dev, false);
> > >+ if (ret) {
> > I think we discussed this in v1, but erring out here means that all the
> > devices need to have pm domain attached, which might not be true all the
> > time.
> oh yes, sorry i missed this one. will fix
Looking at this pattern here I'm wondering if this should be folded into
the domain code, everything attaching a domain is going to need to take
care of this at the minute.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists