linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.13 16/44] soreuseport: fix initialization race

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20171116172824.359517751@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Thu, 16 Nov 2017 18:42:40 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Craig Gallek <kraig@...gle.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: [PATCH 4.13 16/44] soreuseport: fix initialization race

4.13-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Craig Gallek <kraig@...gle.com>


[ Upstream commit 1b5f962e71bfad6284574655c406597535c3ea7a ]

Syzkaller stumbled upon a way to trigger
WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 13881 at net/core/sock_reuseport.c:41
reuseport_alloc+0x306/0x3b0 net/core/sock_reuseport.c:39

There are two initialization paths for the sock_reuseport structure in a
socket: Through the udp/tcp bind paths of SO_REUSEPORT sockets or through
SO_ATTACH_REUSEPORT_[CE]BPF before bind.  The existing implementation
assumedthat the socket lock protected both of these paths when it actually
only protects the SO_ATTACH_REUSEPORT path.  Syzkaller triggered this
double allocation by running these paths concurrently.

This patch moves the check for double allocation into the reuseport_alloc
function which is protected by a global spin lock.

Fixes: e32ea7e74727 ("soreuseport: fast reuseport UDP socket selection")
Fixes: c125e80b8868 ("soreuseport: fast reuseport TCP socket selection")
Signed-off-by: Craig Gallek <kraig@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 net/core/sock_reuseport.c  |   12 +++++++++---
 net/ipv4/inet_hashtables.c |    5 +----
 net/ipv4/udp.c             |    5 +----
 3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

--- a/net/core/sock_reuseport.c
+++ b/net/core/sock_reuseport.c
@@ -36,9 +36,14 @@ int reuseport_alloc(struct sock *sk)
 	 * soft irq of receive path or setsockopt from process context
 	 */
 	spin_lock_bh(&reuseport_lock);
-	WARN_ONCE(rcu_dereference_protected(sk->sk_reuseport_cb,
-					    lockdep_is_held(&reuseport_lock)),
-		  "multiple allocations for the same socket");
+
+	/* Allocation attempts can occur concurrently via the setsockopt path
+	 * and the bind/hash path.  Nothing to do when we lose the race.
+	 */
+	if (rcu_dereference_protected(sk->sk_reuseport_cb,
+				      lockdep_is_held(&reuseport_lock)))
+		goto out;
+
 	reuse = __reuseport_alloc(INIT_SOCKS);
 	if (!reuse) {
 		spin_unlock_bh(&reuseport_lock);
@@ -49,6 +54,7 @@ int reuseport_alloc(struct sock *sk)
 	reuse->num_socks = 1;
 	rcu_assign_pointer(sk->sk_reuseport_cb, reuse);
 
+out:
 	spin_unlock_bh(&reuseport_lock);
 
 	return 0;
--- a/net/ipv4/inet_hashtables.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/inet_hashtables.c
@@ -449,10 +449,7 @@ static int inet_reuseport_add_sock(struc
 			return reuseport_add_sock(sk, sk2);
 	}
 
-	/* Initial allocation may have already happened via setsockopt */
-	if (!rcu_access_pointer(sk->sk_reuseport_cb))
-		return reuseport_alloc(sk);
-	return 0;
+	return reuseport_alloc(sk);
 }
 
 int __inet_hash(struct sock *sk, struct sock *osk)
--- a/net/ipv4/udp.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/udp.c
@@ -231,10 +231,7 @@ static int udp_reuseport_add_sock(struct
 		}
 	}
 
-	/* Initial allocation may have already happened via setsockopt */
-	if (!rcu_access_pointer(sk->sk_reuseport_cb))
-		return reuseport_alloc(sk);
-	return 0;
+	return reuseport_alloc(sk);
 }
 
 /**