[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFzWk=n_GV1=JHdgQfJ2yQU6gXyG87v3J65xdBXWkfTyDA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2017 10:47:19 -0800
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@....com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] arm64: updates for 4.15
On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 3:51 AM, Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com> wrote:
> From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
> Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2017 10:49:34 +0000
> Subject: [PATCH] irqdesc: Use bool return type instead of int
Thomas, will you take this in the irq branches, or should I just apply
it directly because it's "one of Linus' hangups".
It's not urgent, there hopefully aren't actually any existing bad
cases, it's purely "future mis-use safety".
Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists