lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171116205042.wyl6x2q5tjwmoyeg@treble>
Date:   Thu, 16 Nov 2017 14:50:42 -0600
From:   Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
To:     Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>
Cc:     x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...izon.com>,
        live-patching@...r.kernel.org, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
        Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>,
        Alok Kataria <akataria@...are.com>,
        Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
        virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
        xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/13] x86/paravirt: Fix output constraint macro names

On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 11:33:43AM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 04/10/17 17:58, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > Some of the paravirt '*_CLOBBERS' macros refer to output constraints
> > instead of clobbers, which makes the code extra confusing.  Rename the
> > output constraint related macros to '*_OUTPUTS'.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
> 
> I'm fine with the changes, but you might want to rename the "call_clbr"
> parameter of ____PVOP_[V]CALL, too, e.g. to "outputs".

Yeah, good catch.

> You could then drop the "CALL_" from the macros, too.

Hm, which macros are you referring to, and why?

-- 
Josh

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ