[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1711162208350.2109@nanos>
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2017 22:14:32 +0100 (CET)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Dave Watson <davejwatson@...com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-api@...r.kernel.org, Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Andrew Hunter <ahh@...gle.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, Chris Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Ben Maurer <bmaurer@...com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH for 4.15 04/24] Restartable sequences: x86 32/64
architecture support
On Tue, 14 Nov 2017, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
Please fix the subject line:
x86: Add support for restartable sequences
or something like that.
And for the actual rseq patches please come up with a proper short
susbsytem prefix for restartable sequences. There is no point in occupying
half of the subject space for a prefix.
Other than that.
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists