linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4.4 00/28] 4.4.99-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 17 Nov 2017 09:44:20 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
Cc:     "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>, patches@...nelci.org,
        Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk>,
        linux- stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
        natechancellor@...il.com, Tom Gall <tom.gall@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.4 00/28] 4.4.99-stable review

On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 01:56:18PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> On 17 November 2017 at 13:46,  <natechancellor@...il.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 06:42:18PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> >> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.99 release.
> >> There are 28 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> >> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> >> let me know.
> >>
> >> Responses should be made by Sat Nov 18 17:41:29 UTC 2017.
> >> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >>
> >> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> >>       kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.4.99-rc1.gz
> >> or in the git tree and branch at:
> >>   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.4.y
> >> and the diffstat can be found below.
> >>
> >> thanks,
> >>
> >> greg k-h
> 
> Results from Linaro’s test farm.
> Also as per usual the HiKey results are reported separate because the
> platform support isn’t in tree.
> 
> No regression found.

Great, thanks for testing and letting me know.

greg k-h