[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171117100732.GA14762@kroah.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2017 11:07:32 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...uxfoundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Kate Stewart <kate@...uxfoundation.org>,
Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@...b.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Russell King <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>,
Rob Herring <rob.herring@...aro.org>,
Jonas Oberg <jonas@...e.org>, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org,
Charlemagne Lasse <charlemagnelasse@...il.com>,
Carmen Bianca Bakker <carmenbianca@...e.org>
Subject: Re: [patch V2 01/11] Documentation: Add license-rules.rst to
describe how to properly identify file licenses
On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 07:33:07PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> +2. Style:
> +
> + The SPDX license identifier is added in form of a comment. The comment
> + style depends on the file type:
> +
> + ::
> +
> + C source: // SPDX-License-Identifier: <SPDX License Expression>
> + C header: /* SPDX-License-Identifier: <SPDX License Expression> */
> + ASM: /* SPDX-License-Identifier: <SPDX License Expression> */
> + scripts: # SPDX-License-Identifier: <SPDX License Expression>
> + .rst: .. SPDX-License-Identifier: <SPDX License Expression>
Minor nit, do you want a tab there on the .rst line or should it be all
spaces like the other lines above it to make things line up properly?
Otherwise, looks great to me:
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists