Message-ID: <20171117130154.GG19033@jade>
Date:   Fri, 17 Nov 2017 11:01:54 -0200
From:   Gustavo Padovan <gustavo@...ovan.org>
To:     Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@...omium.org>
Cc:     linux-media@...r.kernel.org, Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@....samsung.com>,
        Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>,
        Pawel Osciak <pawel@...iak.com>,
        Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@....fi>,
        Brian Starkey <brian.starkey@....com>,
        Thierry Escande <thierry.escande@...labora.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@...labora.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v5 07/11] [media] vb2: add in-fence support to QBUF

2017-11-17 Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@...omium.org>:

> Hi Gustavo,
> 
> I am coming a bit late in this series' review, so apologies if some of my
> comments have already have been discussed in an earlier revision.
> 
> On Thursday, November 16, 2017 2:10:53 AM JST, Gustavo Padovan wrote:
> > From: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@...labora.com>
> > 
> > Receive in-fence from userspace and add support for waiting on them
> > before queueing the buffer to the driver. Buffers can't be queued to the
> > driver before its fences signal. And a buffer can't be queue to the driver
> > out of the order they were queued from userspace. That means that even if
> > it fence signal it must wait all other buffers, ahead of it in the queue,
> > to signal first.
> > 
> > To make that possible we use fence_array to keep that ordering. Basically
> > we create a fence_array that contains both the current fence and the fence
> > from the previous buffer (which might be a fence array as well). The base
> > fence class for the fence_array becomes the new buffer fence, waiting on
> > that one guarantees that it won't be queued out of order.
> > 
> > v6:
> > 	- With fences always keep the order userspace queues the buffers.
> > 	- Protect in_fence manipulation with a lock (Brian Starkey)
> > 	- check if fences have the same context before adding a fence array
> > 	- Fix last_fence ref unbalance in __set_in_fence() (Brian Starkey)
> > 	- Clean up fence if __set_in_fence() fails (Brian Starkey)
> > 	- treat -EINVAL from dma_fence_add_callback() (Brian Starkey)
> > 
> > v5:	- use fence_array to keep buffers ordered in vb2 core when
> > 	needed (Brian Starkey)
> > 	- keep backward compat on the reserved2 field (Brian Starkey)
> > 	- protect fence callback removal with lock (Brian Starkey)
> > 
> > v4:
> > 	- Add a comment about dma_fence_add_callback() not returning a
> > 	error (Hans)
> > 	- Call dma_fence_put(vb->in_fence) if fence signaled (Hans)
> > 	- select SYNC_FILE under config VIDEOBUF2_CORE (Hans)
> > 	- Move dma_fence_is_signaled() check to __enqueue_in_driver() (Hans)
> > 	- Remove list_for_each_entry() in __vb2_core_qbuf() (Hans)
> > 	-  Remove if (vb->state != VB2_BUF_STATE_QUEUED) from
> > 	vb2_start_streaming() (Hans)
> > 	- set IN_FENCE flags on __fill_v4l2_buffer (Hans)
> > 	- Queue buffers to the driver as soon as they are ready (Hans)
> > 	- call fill_user_buffer() after queuing the buffer (Hans)
> > 	- add err: label to clean up fence
> > 	- add dma_fence_wait() before calling vb2_start_streaming()
> > 
> > v3:	- document fence parameter
> > 	- remove ternary if at vb2_qbuf() return (Mauro)
> > 	- do not change if conditions behaviour (Mauro)
> > 
> > v2:
> > 	- fix vb2_queue_or_prepare_buf() ret check
> > 	- remove check for VB2_MEMORY_DMABUF only (Javier)
> > 	- check num of ready buffers to start streaming
> > 	- when queueing, start from the first ready buffer
> > 	- handle queue cancel
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@...labora.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/media/v4l2-core/Kconfig          |   1 +
> >  drivers/media/v4l2-core/videobuf2-core.c | 202
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> >  drivers/media/v4l2-core/videobuf2-v4l2.c |  29 ++++-
> >  include/media/videobuf2-core.h           |  17 ++-
> >  4 files changed, 231 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/Kconfig
> > b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/Kconfig
> > index a35c33686abf..3f988c407c80 100644
> > --- a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/Kconfig
> > @@ -83,6 +83,7 @@ config VIDEOBUF_DVB
> >  # Used by drivers that need Videobuf2 modules
> >  config VIDEOBUF2_CORE
> >  	select DMA_SHARED_BUFFER
> > +	select SYNC_FILE
> >  	tristate
> >  config VIDEOBUF2_MEMOPS
> > diff --git a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/videobuf2-core.c
> > b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/videobuf2-core.c
> > index 60f8b582396a..26de4c80717d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/videobuf2-core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/videobuf2-core.c
> > @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
> >  #include <linux/sched.h>
> >  #include <linux/freezer.h>
> >  #include <linux/kthread.h>
> > +#include <linux/dma-fence-array.h>
> >  #include <media/videobuf2-core.h>
> >  #include <media/v4l2-mc.h>
> > @@ -346,6 +347,7 @@ static int __vb2_queue_alloc(struct vb2_queue *q,
> > enum vb2_memory memory,
> >  		vb->index = q->num_buffers + buffer;
> >  		vb->type = q->type;
> >  		vb->memory = memory;
> > +		spin_lock_init(&vb->fence_cb_lock);
> >  		for (plane = 0; plane < num_planes; ++plane) {
> >  			vb->planes[plane].length = plane_sizes[plane];
> >  			vb->planes[plane].min_length = plane_sizes[plane];
> > @@ -1222,6 +1224,9 @@ static void __enqueue_in_driver(struct vb2_buffer *vb)
> >  {
> >  	struct vb2_queue *q = vb->vb2_queue;
> > +	if (vb->in_fence && !dma_fence_is_signaled(vb->in_fence))
> > +		return;
> > +
> >  	vb->state = VB2_BUF_STATE_ACTIVE;
> >  	atomic_inc(&q->owned_by_drv_count);
> >   @@ -1273,6 +1278,23 @@ static int __buf_prepare(struct vb2_buffer *vb,
> > const void *pb)
> >  	return 0;
> >  }
> > +static int __get_num_ready_buffers(struct vb2_queue *q)
> > +{
> > +	struct vb2_buffer *vb;
> > +	int ready_count = 0;
> > +	unsigned long flags;
> > +
> > +	/* count num of buffers ready in front of the queued_list */
> > +	list_for_each_entry(vb, &q->queued_list, queued_entry) {
> > +		spin_lock_irqsave(&vb->fence_cb_lock, flags);
> > +		if (!vb->in_fence || dma_fence_is_signaled(vb->in_fence))
> > +			ready_count++;
> > +		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vb->fence_cb_lock, flags);
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	return ready_count;
> > +}
> > +
> >  int vb2_core_prepare_buf(struct vb2_queue *q, unsigned int index, void *pb)
> >  {
> >  	struct vb2_buffer *vb;
> > @@ -1361,9 +1383,87 @@ static int vb2_start_streaming(struct vb2_queue *q)
> >  	return ret;
> >  }
> > -int vb2_core_qbuf(struct vb2_queue *q, unsigned int index, void *pb)
> > +static struct dma_fence *__set_in_fence(struct vb2_queue *q,
> > +					struct vb2_buffer *vb,
> > +					struct dma_fence *fence)
> > +{
> > +	if (q->last_fence && dma_fence_is_signaled(q->last_fence)) {
> > +		dma_fence_put(q->last_fence);
> > +		q->last_fence = NULL;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	/*
> > +	 * We always guarantee the ordering of buffers queued from
> > +	 * userspace to be the same it is queued to the driver. For that
> > +	 * we create a fence array with the fence from the last queued
> > +	 * buffer and this one, that way the fence for this buffer can't
> > +	 * signal before the last one.
> > +	 */
> > +	if (fence && q->last_fence) {
> > +		struct dma_fence **fences;
> > +		struct dma_fence_array *arr;
> > +
> > +		if (fence->context == q->last_fence->context) {
> > +			if (fence->seqno - q->last_fence->seqno <= INT_MAX) {
> > +				dma_fence_put(q->last_fence);
> > +				q->last_fence = dma_fence_get(fence);
> > +			} else {
> > +				dma_fence_put(fence);
> > +				fence = dma_fence_get(q->last_fence);
> > +			}
> > +			return fence;
> > +		}
> > +
> > +		fences = kcalloc(2, sizeof(*fences), GFP_KERNEL);
> > +		if (!fences)
> > +			return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> > +
> > +		fences[0] = fence;
> > +		fences[1] = q->last_fence;
> > +
> > +		arr = dma_fence_array_create(2, fences,
> > +					     dma_fence_context_alloc(1),
> > +					     1, false);
> > +		if (!arr) {
> > +			kfree(fences);
> > +			return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> > +		}
> > +
> > +		fence = &arr->base;
> > +
> > +		q->last_fence = dma_fence_get(fence);
> > +	} else if (!fence && q->last_fence) {
> > +		fence = dma_fence_get(q->last_fence);
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	return fence;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void vb2_qbuf_fence_cb(struct dma_fence *f, struct dma_fence_cb *cb)
> > +{
> > +	struct vb2_buffer *vb = container_of(cb, struct vb2_buffer, fence_cb);
> > +	struct vb2_queue *q = vb->vb2_queue;
> > +	unsigned long flags;
> > +
> > +	spin_lock_irqsave(&vb->fence_cb_lock, flags);
> > +	if (!vb->in_fence) {
> > +		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vb->fence_cb_lock, flags);
> > +		return;
> > +	}
> 
> Is this block necessary? IIUC the callback will never be set on buffers
> without
> an input fence, so (!vb->in_fence) should never be satisfied.

Not anymore! I added it when trying to fix the potential race condition
in the wrong way, but the newly added spinlock fixes that.

> 
> > +
> > +	dma_fence_put(vb->in_fence);
> > +	vb->in_fence = NULL;
> > +
> > +	if (q->start_streaming_called)
> > +		__enqueue_in_driver(vb);
> > +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vb->fence_cb_lock, flags);
> > +}
> > +
> > +int vb2_core_qbuf(struct vb2_queue *q, unsigned int index, void *pb,
> > +		  struct dma_fence *fence)
> >  {
> >  	struct vb2_buffer *vb;
> > +	unsigned long flags;
> >  	int ret;
> >  	vb = q->bufs[index];
> > @@ -1372,16 +1472,18 @@ int vb2_core_qbuf(struct vb2_queue *q, unsigned
> > int index, void *pb)
> >  	case VB2_BUF_STATE_DEQUEUED:
> >  		ret = __buf_prepare(vb, pb);
> >  		if (ret)
> > -			return ret;
> > +			goto err;
> >  		break;
> >  	case VB2_BUF_STATE_PREPARED:
> >  		break;
> >  	case VB2_BUF_STATE_PREPARING:
> >  		dprintk(1, "buffer still being prepared\n");
> > -		return -EINVAL;
> > +		ret = -EINVAL;
> > +		goto err;
> >  	default:
> >  		dprintk(1, "invalid buffer state %d\n", vb->state);
> > -		return -EINVAL;
> > +		ret = -EINVAL;
> > +		goto err;
> >  	}
> >  	/*
> > @@ -1398,30 +1500,83 @@ int vb2_core_qbuf(struct vb2_queue *q, unsigned
> > int index, void *pb)
> >  	trace_vb2_qbuf(q, vb);
> > +	vb->in_fence = __set_in_fence(q, vb, fence);
> > +	if (IS_ERR(vb->in_fence)) {
> > +		dma_fence_put(fence);
> > +		ret = PTR_ERR(vb->in_fence);
> > +		goto err;
> > +	}
> > +	fence = NULL;
> > +
> > +	/*
> > +	 * If it is time to call vb2_start_streaming() wait for the fence
> > +	 * to signal first. Of course, this happens only once per streaming.
> > +	 * We want to run any step that might fail before we set the callback
> > +	 * to queue the fence when it signals.
> > +	 */
> > +	if (vb->in_fence && !q->start_streaming_called &&
> > +	    __get_num_ready_buffers(q) == q->min_buffers_needed - 1)
> > +		dma_fence_wait(vb->in_fence, true);
> 
> Mmm, that's a tough call. Userspace may unexpectingly block due to this
> (which
> fences are supposed to prevent), not sure how much of a problem this may be.

Yes, but it happen just once per stream, when we are about to start it.
Alternatively, we can wait later, and if the fence wait returns a error
we can carry it until we are able to send the buffer back with error on
DQBUF.

> 
> > +
> >  	/*
> >  	 * If streamon has been called, and we haven't yet called
> >  	 * start_streaming() since not enough buffers were queued, and
> >  	 * we now have reached the minimum number of queued buffers,
> >  	 * then we can finally call start_streaming().
> > -	 *
> > -	 * If already streaming, give the buffer to driver for processing.
> > -	 * If not, the buffer will be given to driver on next streamon.
> >  	 */
> >  	if (q->streaming && !q->start_streaming_called &&
> > -	    q->queued_count >= q->min_buffers_needed) {
> > +	    __get_num_ready_buffers(q) >= q->min_buffers_needed) {
> >  		ret = vb2_start_streaming(q);
> >  		if (ret)
> > -			return ret;
> > -	} else if (q->start_streaming_called) {
> > -		__enqueue_in_driver(vb);
> > +			goto err;
> >  	}
> > +	/*
> > +	 * For explicit synchronization: If the fence didn't signal
> > +	 * yet we setup a callback to queue the buffer once the fence
> > +	 * signals, and then, return successfully. But if the fence
> > +	 * already signaled we lose the reference we held and queue the
> > +	 * buffer to the driver.
> > +	 */
> > +	spin_lock_irqsave(&vb->fence_cb_lock, flags);
> > +	if (vb->in_fence) {
> > +		ret = dma_fence_add_callback(vb->in_fence, &vb->fence_cb,
> > +					     vb2_qbuf_fence_cb);
> > +		if (ret == -EINVAL) {
> > +			spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vb->fence_cb_lock, flags);
> > +			goto err;
> > +		} else if (!ret) {
> > +			goto fill;
> > +		}
> > +
> > +		dma_fence_put(vb->in_fence);
> > +		vb->in_fence = NULL;
> 
> I suppose the last two lines are supposed to be called when
> dma_fence_add_callback() returns -ENOENT, because the fence has already been
> signaled? In that case I think the code would be more readable if you made
> it
> more explicit, something like:
> 
> // fence already signaled?
> if (ret == -ENOENT) {
> 	dma_fence_put(vb->in_fence);
> 	vb->in_fence = NULL;
> } else if (ret != 0) {
> 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vb->fence_cb_lock, flags);
> 	goto err;
> }
> 
> and that way you can get rid of the short-ranged fill: label.

Yes, that is a better way to write it!

> 
> > +	}
> > +
> > +fill:
> > +	/*
> > +	 * If already streaming and there is no fence to wait on
> > +	 * give the buffer to driver for processing.
> > +	 */
> > +	if (q->start_streaming_called && !vb->in_fence)
> > +		__enqueue_in_driver(vb);
> 
> Since that code was previously called when vb2_start_streaming() wasn't, we
> had a guarantee that the buffer was only queued once. Now I wonder if we
> could
> not run into a situation where __enqueue_in_driver is called twice for the
> last
> queued buffer, once by vb2_start_streaming() and once here, now that
> vb2_start_streaming() has set q->start_streaming_called to 1?

maybe check for buffer state == QUEUED may suffice, I'll investigate it
further.

> 
> > +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vb->fence_cb_lock, flags);
> > +
> >  	/* Fill buffer information for the userspace */
> >  	if (pb)
> >  		call_void_bufop(q, fill_user_buffer, vb, pb);
> >  	dprintk(2, "qbuf of buffer %d succeeded\n", vb->index);
> >  	return 0;
> > +
> > +err:
> > +	if (vb->in_fence) {
> > +		dma_fence_put(vb->in_fence);
> > +		vb->in_fence = NULL;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	return ret;
> > +
> >  }
> >  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vb2_core_qbuf);
> > @@ -1632,6 +1787,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vb2_core_dqbuf);
> >  static void __vb2_queue_cancel(struct vb2_queue *q)
> >  {
> >  	unsigned int i;
> > +	struct vb2_buffer *vb;
> > +	unsigned long flags;
> >  	/*
> >  	 * Tell driver to stop all transactions and release all queued
> > @@ -1659,6 +1816,21 @@ static void __vb2_queue_cancel(struct vb2_queue *q)
> >  	q->queued_count = 0;
> >  	q->error = 0;
> > +	list_for_each_entry(vb, &q->queued_list, queued_entry) {
> > +		spin_lock_irqsave(&vb->fence_cb_lock, flags);
> > +		if (vb->in_fence) {
> > +			dma_fence_remove_callback(vb->in_fence, &vb->fence_cb);
> > +			dma_fence_put(vb->in_fence);
> > +			vb->in_fence = NULL;
> > +		}
> > +		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vb->fence_cb_lock, flags);
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	if (q->last_fence) {
> > +		dma_fence_put(q->last_fence);
> > +		q->last_fence = NULL;
> > +	}
> > +
> >  	/*
> >  	 * Remove all buffers from videobuf's list...
> >  	 */
> > @@ -1720,7 +1892,7 @@ int vb2_core_streamon(struct vb2_queue *q,
> > unsigned int type)
> >  	 * Tell driver to start streaming provided sufficient buffers
> >  	 * are available.
> >  	 */
> > -	if (q->queued_count >= q->min_buffers_needed) {
> > +	if (__get_num_ready_buffers(q) >= q->min_buffers_needed) {
> >  		ret = v4l_vb2q_enable_media_source(q);
> >  		if (ret)
> >  			return ret;
> > @@ -2240,7 +2412,7 @@ static int __vb2_init_fileio(struct vb2_queue *q,
> > int read)
> >  		 * Queue all buffers.
> >  		 */
> >  		for (i = 0; i < q->num_buffers; i++) {
> > -			ret = vb2_core_qbuf(q, i, NULL);
> > +			ret = vb2_core_qbuf(q, i, NULL, NULL);
> >  			if (ret)
> >  				goto err_reqbufs;
> >  			fileio->bufs[i].queued = 1;
> > @@ -2419,7 +2591,7 @@ static size_t __vb2_perform_fileio(struct
> > vb2_queue *q, char __user *data, size_
> >  		if (copy_timestamp)
> >  			b->timestamp = ktime_get_ns();
> > -		ret = vb2_core_qbuf(q, index, NULL);
> > +		ret = vb2_core_qbuf(q, index, NULL, NULL);
> >  		dprintk(5, "vb2_dbuf result: %d\n", ret);
> >  		if (ret)
> >  			return ret;
> > @@ -2522,7 +2694,7 @@ static int vb2_thread(void *data)
> >  		if (copy_timestamp)
> >  			vb->timestamp = ktime_get_ns();;
> >  		if (!threadio->stop)
> > -			ret = vb2_core_qbuf(q, vb->index, NULL);
> > +			ret = vb2_core_qbuf(q, vb->index, NULL, NULL);
> >  		call_void_qop(q, wait_prepare, q);
> >  		if (ret || threadio->stop)
> >  			break;
> > diff --git a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/videobuf2-v4l2.c
> > b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/videobuf2-v4l2.c
> > index 110fb45fef6f..4c09ea007d90 100644
> > --- a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/videobuf2-v4l2.c
> > +++ b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/videobuf2-v4l2.c
> > @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
> >  #include <linux/sched.h>
> >  #include <linux/freezer.h>
> >  #include <linux/kthread.h>
> > +#include <linux/sync_file.h>
> >  #include <media/v4l2-dev.h>
> >  #include <media/v4l2-fh.h>
> > @@ -178,6 +179,12 @@ static int vb2_queue_or_prepare_buf(struct
> > vb2_queue *q, struct v4l2_buffer *b,
> >  		return -EINVAL;
> >  	}
> > +	if ((b->fence_fd != 0 && b->fence_fd != -1) &&
> 
> Why do we need to consider both values invalid? Can 0 ever be a valid fence
> fd?

For backward compatibility we need to exclude 0.

> 
> For completeness you may also want to check the case where (b->fence_fd ==
> -1 &&
> (b->flags & V4L2_BUF_FLAG_IN_FENCE)) and return an error ahead of time, but
> I
> suppose the call to sync_file_get_fence() later on will catch this as well.

Yes, I think we can add this check too.

Gustavo

Powered by blists - more mailing lists