linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] PM / core: Add LEAVE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAPDyKFrsabWL2cVE2SwguRRiEV5sJHLpzpyhahLucdER_RAEpg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 17 Nov 2017 14:49:20 +0100
From:   Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
To:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux PCI <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Documentation <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
        Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] PM / core: Add LEAVE_SUSPENDED driver flag

[...]

>>
>>>> Second, have you considered setting the default value of
>>>> dev->power.may_skip_resume to true?
>>>
>>> Yes.
>>>
>>>> That would means the subsystem
>>>> instead need to implement an opt-out method. I am thinking that it may
>>>> not be an issue, since we anyway at this point, don't have drivers
>>>> using the LEAVE_SUSPENDED flag.
>>>
>>> Opt-out doesn't work because of the need to invoke the "noirq" callbacks.
>>
>> I am not sure I follow that.
>>
>> Whatever needs to be fixed on the subsystem level, that could be done
>> before the driver starts using the LEAVE_SUSPENDED flag. No?
>
> That requires a bit of explanation, sorry for being overly concise.
>
> The core calls ->resume_noirq from the middle layer regardless of
> whether or not the device will be left suspended, so the
> ->resume_noirq cannot do arbitrary things to it.  Setting
> may_skip_resume by the middle layer tells the core that the middle
> layer is ready for that and is going to cooperate.  If may_skip_resume
> had been set by default, that piece of information would have been
> missing.

Huh, I still don't get that. Sorry.

If the "may_skip_resume" is default set to true by the PM core,
wouldn't that just mean that the middle-layer needs to implement an
opt-out method, rather than opt-in. In principle to opt-out the
middle-layer needs to set may_skip_resume to false in suspend_noirq
phase, no?

Then we only need to make sure drivers don't starts use
LEAVE_SUSPENDED, before we make sure the middle layers is adopted. But
that should not be a problem.

The benefit would be that those middle layers that can cope with
LEAVE_SUSPENDED as of today don't need to change.

Kind regards
Uffe