[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171117154833.GA56337@otc-nc-03>
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2017 07:48:34 -0800
From: "Raj, Ashok" <ashok.raj@...el.com>
To: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
Cc: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>, leedom@...lsio.com,
herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, Harsh@...lsio.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iommu/vt-d: Fix scatterlist offset handling
Hi Alex
On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 09:18:14AM -0700, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Nov 2017 13:09:33 -0800
> "Raj, Ashok" <ashok.raj@...el.com> wrote:
>
> > >
> > > What do we do about this? I certainly can't rip out large page support
> > > and put a stable tag on the patch. I'm not really spotting what's
> > > wrong with large page support here, other than the comment about it
> > > being a mess. Suggestions? Thanks,
> > >
> >
> > Largepage seems to work and i don't think we need to rip it out. When
> > Harsh tested it at one point we thought disabling super-page seemed to make
> > the problem go away. Jacob tested and we still saw the need for Robin's patch.
> >
> > Yes, the function looks humongous but i don't think we should wait for that
> > before this merge.
>
> Ok. Who wants to toss in review and testing sign-offs? Clearly
> there's been a lot more eyes and effort on this patch than reflected in
> the original posting. I'll add a stable cc. Thanks,
Reported by: Harsh <harsh@...lsio.com>
Reviewed by: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...el.com>
Tested by: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...el.com>
>
> Alex
Powered by blists - more mailing lists