lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <E7B2D113-C30D-4A32-AFB6-DC91DDADE0E8@physik.fu-berlin.de>
Date:   Fri, 17 Nov 2017 18:49:39 +0100
From:   John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de>
To:     Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>
Cc:     Yoshinori Sato <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>,
        linux-sh@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>
Subject: Re: [J-core] [PATCH v5 00/22] sh: LANDISK and R2Dplus convert to device tree

I’ll have a go at this tonight and if the patches still apply fine, I’d just say go for it.

> On Nov 17, 2017, at 6:39 PM, Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net> wrote:
> 
>> On 11/17/2017 04:37 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
>> Hi there!
>> 
>>> On 07/03/2016 06:46 PM, Yoshinori Sato wrote:
>>> SH get devicetree support. But it not working on existing H/W.
>>> 
>>> IO-DATA HDL-U (aka landisk) currentry supported.
>>> This H/W like SH7751 evalution board. It's a best to use this as a
>>> change base H/W.
>>> RTS7751R2Dplus is QEMU-SH4 target. So easy trying.
>> 
>> This patch series - which would make a huge improvement - is still not
>> applied. It would be very useful to be able to test the device tree
>> implementation with QEMU.
>> 
>> Any of the SH maintainers can apply this?
> 
> It's Rich's call, but given that it's _from_ one of the sh maintainers,
> sounds to me like it can just go in if it still applies? (If there's
> bugfixes needed they can go in -rc2 or so, after this merge window.)
> 
> Given that qemu serial's been broken for 9 months now, I doubt this
> would make anything worse. (I should really check Cedric's qemu fork to
> see if he fixed that...)
> 
> Rob

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ