linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 03/13] x86/paravirt: Convert native patch assembly code strings to macros

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20171117180713.e4up3dwrszpatka6@pd.tnic>
Date:   Fri, 17 Nov 2017 19:07:13 +0100
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:     Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
Cc:     x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...izon.com>,
        live-patching@...r.kernel.org, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
        Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>,
        Alok Kataria <akataria@...are.com>,
        Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
        virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
        xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/13] x86/paravirt: Convert native patch assembly code
 strings to macros

On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 10:58:24AM -0500, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> Convert the hard-coded native patch assembly code strings to macros to
> facilitate sharing common code between 32-bit and 64-bit.
> 
> These macros will also be used by a future patch which requires the GCC
> extended asm syntax of two '%' characters instead of one when specifying
> a register name.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/include/asm/special_insns.h | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  arch/x86/kernel/paravirt_patch_32.c  | 21 +++++++++++----------
>  arch/x86/kernel/paravirt_patch_64.c  | 29 +++++++++++++++--------------
>  3 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/special_insns.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/special_insns.h
> index ac402c6fc24b..0549c5f2c1b3 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/special_insns.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/special_insns.h
> @@ -6,6 +6,30 @@
>  
>  #include <asm/nops.h>
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
> +# define _REG_ARG1			"%rdi"
> +# define NATIVE_IDENTITY_32		"mov %edi, %eax"

Yeah, that "identity" looks strange. How about NATIVE_NOOP and
NATIVE_NOOP_32 ?

> +# define NATIVE_USERGS_SYSRET64		"swapgs; sysretq"
> +#else
> +# define _REG_ARG1			"%eax"
> +#endif
> +
> +#define _REG_RET			"%" _ASM_AX
> +
> +#define NATIVE_ZERO			"xor " _REG_ARG1 ", " _REG_ARG1

NATIVE_ZERO_OUT

I guess. NATIVE_ZERO reads like the native representation of 0 :-)

...

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.