[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171117153847.251e578d@lwn.net>
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2017 15:38:47 -0700
From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...uxfoundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...uxfoundation.org>,
Kate Stewart <kstewart@...uxfoundation.org>,
Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@...b.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Russell King <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>,
Rob Herring <rob.herring@...aro.org>,
Jonas Oberg <jonas@...e.org>, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org,
Charlemagne Lasse <charlemagnelasse@...il.com>,
Carmen Bianca Bakker <carmenbianca@...e.org>
Subject: Re: [patch V3 01/11] Documentation: Add license-rules.rst to
describe how to properly identify file licenses
On Fri, 17 Nov 2017 10:48:57 +0100 (CET)
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
> > > +The following describes the license of the Linux kernel source code
> > > +(GPLv2), how to properly mark the license of individual files in the source
> > > +tree, as well as links to the full license text.
> > > +
> > > +.. toctree::
> > > + :maxdepth: 2
> > > +
> > > + process/license-rules.rst
> > > +
> >
> > I'll confess that I'm not convinced that information on license identifiers
> > is the very first thing readers should encounter when entering the kernel's
> > documentation. But I'll not quibble about it for now, we can always move
> > it later :)
>
> Any suggestions for a better place?
I'd put it into Documentation/process/index.rst. That is where we have
put the rest of that kind of information - stuff that people who want to
do kernel development need to know.
Other than that quibble, V4 looks good to me; toss in a
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
if you like.
Thanks,
jon
Powered by blists - more mailing lists