[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <4123c03394df1d0a1349a9eeebf74fcf760c79d5.1510994295.git.arvind.yadav.cs@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2017 14:20:48 +0530
From: Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@...il.com>
To: lee.jones@...aro.org, maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com,
wens@...e.org, linux@...linux.org.uk
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/3 v2] mfd: intel-lpss: Handle return value of platform_get_irq
platform_get_irq() can fail here and we must check its return value.
Signed-off-by: Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@...il.com>
---
changes in v2 :
Add failure case '<= 0' instead of '< 0'. If IRQ0 is not valid.
drivers/mfd/intel-lpss-acpi.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/mfd/intel-lpss-acpi.c b/drivers/mfd/intel-lpss-acpi.c
index 7911b0a..cb84de5 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/intel-lpss-acpi.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/intel-lpss-acpi.c
@@ -92,6 +92,8 @@ static int intel_lpss_acpi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
info->mem = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
info->irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
+ if (!info->mem || info->irq <= 0)
+ return -ENOMEM;
pm_runtime_set_active(&pdev->dev);
pm_runtime_enable(&pdev->dev);
--
2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists