[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <03c6f3e9df6d3077717e1f14b4775f2864a0304a.1510995185.git.arvind.yadav.cs@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2017 14:40:13 +0530
From: Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@...il.com>
To: arnd@...db.de, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, joel@....id.au,
nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com, alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com,
linux@...linux.org.uk
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/2 v2] misc: atmel-ssc: Fix platform_get_irq's error checking
The platform_get_irq() function returns negative if an error occurs.
zero or positive number on success. platform_get_irq() error checking
for zero is not correct.
Signed-off-by: Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@...il.com>
---
changes in v2 :
Add failure case '<= 0' instead of '< 0'. IRQ 0 is not valid.
drivers/misc/atmel-ssc.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/misc/atmel-ssc.c b/drivers/misc/atmel-ssc.c
index b2a0340..9d9eeae 100644
--- a/drivers/misc/atmel-ssc.c
+++ b/drivers/misc/atmel-ssc.c
@@ -235,9 +235,9 @@ static int ssc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
clk_disable_unprepare(ssc->clk);
ssc->irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
- if (!ssc->irq) {
+ if (ssc->irq <= 0) {
dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "could not get irq\n");
- return -ENXIO;
+ return ssc->irq;
}
spin_lock(&user_lock);
--
2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists