[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <B8AC3E80E903784988AB3003E3E97330C00638D4@dggemm510-mbs.china.huawei.com>
Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2017 10:40:08 +0000
From: "Liuwenliang (Abbott Liu)" <liuwenliang@...wei.com>
To: Christoffer Dall <cdall@...aro.org>
CC: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
"linux@...linux.org.uk" <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
"aryabinin@...tuozzo.com" <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>,
"afzal.mohd.ma@...il.com" <afzal.mohd.ma@...il.com>,
"f.fainelli@...il.com" <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
"labbott@...hat.com" <labbott@...hat.com>,
"kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
"mhocko@...e.com" <mhocko@...e.com>,
"catalin.marinas@....com" <catalin.marinas@....com>,
"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"mawilcox@...rosoft.com" <mawilcox@...rosoft.com>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"thgarnie@...gle.com" <thgarnie@...gle.com>,
"keescook@...omium.org" <keescook@...omium.org>,
"arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>,
"vladimir.murzin@....com" <vladimir.murzin@....com>,
"tixy@...aro.org" <tixy@...aro.org>,
"ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org" <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
"robin.murphy@....com" <robin.murphy@....com>,
"mingo@...nel.org" <mingo@...nel.org>,
"grygorii.strashko@...aro.org" <grygorii.strashko@...aro.org>,
"glider@...gle.com" <glider@...gle.com>,
"dvyukov@...gle.com" <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
"opendmb@...il.com" <opendmb@...il.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"kasan-dev@...glegroups.com" <kasan-dev@...glegroups.com>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Jiazhenghua <jiazhenghua@...wei.com>,
Dailei <dylix.dailei@...wei.com>,
Zengweilin <zengweilin@...wei.com>,
Heshaoliang <heshaoliang@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/11] Initialize the mapping of KASan shadow memory
On Nov 17, 2017 15:36 Christoffer Dall [mailto:cdall@...aro.org] wrote:
>If your processor does support LPAE (like a Cortex-A15 for example),
>then you have both the 32-bit accessors (MRC and MCR) and the 64-bit
>accessors (MRRC, MCRR), and using the 32-bit accessor will simply access
>the lower 32-bits of the 64-bit register.
>
>Hope this helps,
>-Christoffer
If you know the higher 32-bits of the 64-bits cp15's register is not useful for your system,
then you can use the 32-bit accessor to get or set the 64-bit cp15's register.
But if the higher 32-bits of the 64-bits cp15's register is useful for your system,
then you can't use the 32-bit accessor to get or set the 64-bit cp15's register.
TTBR0/TTBR1/PAR's higher 32-bits is useful for CPU supporting LPAE.
The following description which comes from ARM(r) Architecture Reference
Manual ARMv7-A and ARMv7-R edition tell us the reason:
64-bit TTBR0 and TTBR1 format:
...
BADDR, bits[39:x] :
Translation table base address, bits[39:x]. Defining the translation table base address width on
page B4-1698 describes how x is defined.
The value of x determines the required alignment of the translation table, which must be aligned to
2x bytes.
Abbott Liu: Because BADDR on CPU supporting LPAE may be bigger than max value of 32-bit, so bits[39:32] may
be valid value which is useful for the system.
64-bit PAR format
...
PA[39:12]
Physical Address. The physical address corresponding to the supplied virtual address. This field
returns address bits[39:12].
Abbott Liu: Because Physical Address on CPU supporting LPAE may be bigger than max value of 32-bit,
so bits[39:32] may be valid value which is useful for the system.
Conclusion: Don't use 32-bit accessor to get or set TTBR0/TTBR1/PAR on CPU supporting LPAE,
if you do that, your system may run error.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists